READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — May 5, 2015 — Consideration of a Dirt-To-Pave Roadway Matrix — agenda request — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Consideration of a Dirt-To-Pave Roadway Matrix — agenda request — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: May 5, 2015
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Jason Autrey
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Dirt-To-Pave Roadway Matrix
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
BCC DISTRICT: 1&3
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On an annual basis Public Works prepares an improvement plan
that includes dirt-to-pave improvement projects. In years past the suggested improvement list
was based on input from maintenance staff, citizens and commissioners. During the recent
visioning session with the Board of County Commissioners it was requested that staff provide a
matrix that could be utilized in the development of future project lists. A sample matrix has been
developed for consideration.
BACKGROUND: In order to prioritize dirt-to-pave improvement projects staff has developed a
proposed matrix that will assist in ranking roadways. Multiple categories have been developed
that generally describe certain criteria for any given roadway and an assumed weighted value has
been identified for each of those categories. As shown on the attached sample matrix, the
proposed categories are:
Cost: 10% of the overall score: Points are assigned based on an inverse of the cost in relation to
the maximum allowable value the County can perform in house. More expensive projects don't
score as well as less expensive projects because of the impact they would have on the overall
CIP.
Number of Residences: 10% of the overall score: The higher the number of residents that live
directly on the roadway the higher the score for this category.
Traffic Count: 10% of the overall score: The higher the traffic count along the roadway, the
higher the score for this category. This will help rankings for popular cut-through or connecting
roadways.
Economic Development: 5% of the overall score: Roadways that will encourage economic
development will score higher than those that serve non-business related areas.
Right-of-Way Availability: 40% of the overall score: Roadways where right-of-way is available
(through plat, deed or dedication) will score higher than those where inadequate right-of-way
exists. Variations in this value will come from the level of cooperation expressed by the effected
property owners.
Environmental Impact: 10% of the overall score: Sites with greater discharge to natural water
bodies or excessive historical erosion will receive greater consideration.
Constructability: 15% of the overall score: Projects that require less of a construction effort
(such as less earthwork or material transport) or those that are fundamental from a construction
standpoint will score higher in this category.
All categories total up to a maximum point value of 100. It is expected that once enough data is
incorporated into the matrix that there will be multiple roadway segments that end up with
identical scores. To separate those projects the higher scoring right of way, constructability and
cost categories will be utilized in that order.
Values for each category presented on the sample matrix attached can be adjusted over time
based on experiences in using the system. Input of roadway data will occur over time, but
utilization of the matrix can occur immediately based on the existing 5 year Capital Improvement
Plan and known road conditions.
Staff is seeking input/direction regarding the categories and weighted values included on the
Dirt-to-Pave Matrix.
OPTIONS: No formal Board action is required at this time. Staff requests input/direction
regarding the identified categories and the assigned weighted values. Should the provided matrix
be deemed appropriate, staff will immediately begin to populate the spreadsheet to assist with
project rankings for the upcoming budget cycle.
RECOMMENDATIONS: No formal Board action is required at this time. It is recommended
that input/direction be provided on the categories and weighted values depicted on the attached
matrix and with a consensus of the Board staff be directed to use this matrix as policy for future
dirt-to-pave prioritization.
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
John Hofstad, County Administrator
