READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 11-23-2010 Regular — reading text
Part 23 of 60. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-25200-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
clarified.
3) Eliminate the duplication of requirements related to use and development
standards. All use requirements, and only use requirements, should be
provided in Chapter 15. All development standards should be consolidated
into Chapter 16.
Post Office Box 2137 Crystal River, FL 34423 ( 352) 634 -5681 email: Easley.gail@gmail. com
Mr. Robert Mearns
June 7, 2010
Page 5 of 5
4) Separate matters that do not relate to land use and development and place such
matters elsewhere in the Code of Ordinances.
5) Review chapters of the Code of Ordinances that are not part of the LDC to
determine if any information therein should be located within the LDC or
merely cross-referenced by the LDC. At the current time, there is overlap
between LDC chapters and other chapters in the Code of Ordinances.
6) Review and revise the LDC chapter on definitions.
Many definitions are
unclear and many definitions contain regulations. Both situations must be
corrected.
7) Consolidate matters related to natural resource protection into one chapter,
eliminating overlap and duplication of requirements. Update cross -
references to ensure that resource protection standards are met by proposed
developments.
Sincerely,
THE GAIL EASLEY COMPANY
S
V. Gail Easley, FAICP
President
VGE /ms
Attachments:
Draft: Preliminary Review
Inventory of Documents
Post Office Box 2137 Crystal River, FL 34423 ( 352) 634 -5681 email: Easley.gail @gmail. com
Fort Walton Beach Evaluation and Diagnosis Preliminary Review of the LDC
Land evelopment Code
Preliminary Review of the LDC
L Directions 2008— The Fort Walton Beach Comprehensive Plan
A. Future Land Use Element ( "FLUE ")
1. Land planning guidelines:
Maintain beautiful views and vistas to the Bay and Santa Rosa Sound
Maintain a low-rise profile of de velopm en t
Create a tree planting program
Develop a quaint downtown communityplaza and retail center
Develop a series ofhikeways and pedestrian ways
Encourage appropriate new architectural de velopm en t
Create an aestheticallypleasing revitalized City Core
2. Generalized land use — of primary importance is the retention of the small-town
residential character of the City of Fort Walton Beach.
3. Policy A. 1. 1 requires that the Land Development Code ( " LDC ") provide consistency with
the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning and other
procedures do not address consistency ( Chapter 13). This policy is deleted in the proposed
EAR -based amendment, however, consistency is still required by Chapter 163, Part ll, Florida
Statutes.
4. Policy A. 1. 2 requires that zoning districts implement the land use categories on the Future
Land Use Map ( " FLUM "). Rezoning and other procedures do not address consistency
Chapter 13). This policy is deleted in the proposed EAR -based amendment, however,
consistency is still required by Chapter 163, Part ll, Florida Statutes.
5. Policy A.2. 4 requires the LDC to include higher service fees for development not using
existing infrastructure. Such fees are not addressed in the LDC. Therefore, it does not
appear to have been implemented.
6. Table in Policy A.3. 1 defines density as gross but excludes dedicated right -of -way ( "ROW').
Fractions are not rounded up. Chapters 15 and 20 are inconsistent with this definition.
Density, which is discussed extensively in Chapter 15, is referred to as dwelling units per acre
or dwelling units per gross acre, but not excluding dedicated ROW.
7. Policy A.3. 2 states that performance bonuses are based on dedication of an easement for
the Sound Walk, aggregation of parcels, appropriate scale and quality, good architectural
design, good site design, compatibility, adequate open space, and achievement of the
Community Redevelopment Agency Plan ( "CRA Plan ") objectives. The procedures do not
require submittal of information pertaining to performance bonuses ( Chapter 13). Chapter 15
does include requirements for bonus density.
8. Policy A.3. 3 requires urban design guidelines that address building scale, mass,
appearance, material, style,
and color for the Community Redevelopment Area. The
procedures do not require submittal of information to address compliance with urban design
guidelines ( Chapter 13). The urban design guidelines appear to be implemented primarily
through the Urban Master Plan ( "UM Plan'); see specific comments in Section IV of this report.
The design guidelines in the LDC do not address scale, mass, appearance, materials, style, or
color.
The proposed EAR -based amendment deletes this policy, however, other policies
address design standards. The LDC must be amended to adopt design standards.
Page I 1
Fort Walton Beach Evaluation and Diagnosis Preliminary Review of the LDC
Land Development Code
9. Policy A.3. 5 requires that subdivision regulations prevent through- traffic in a
neighborhood; ensure consistency of scale of new buildings; prevent commercial
encroachment; ensure compatibility. Chapter 14 requires that minor streets be laid out to
discourage through traffic. The subdivision regulations do not address scale or compatibility.
10. Policy A.3. 6 requires that any proposed nonresidential development, redevelopment, or
reuse abutting a residential neighborhood submit a residential impact statement, prepared
by a competent professional land planner. The statement must detail mechanisms to
ensure compatibility and programs to mitigate impacts of noise, traffic, odor, and glare.
The procedures in Chapter 13 only require an impact statement for major development, not
linked to the location as set forth in this policy. The procedures do not require that a competent
professional land planner prepare the statement.
11. Policy A.3. 7 requires that all development proposals be reviewed by the Municipal
Planning Board ( "MPB ") or the Community Redevelopment Agency ( " CRA" ), exempting
development of up to three dwelling units and development meeting incentives set forth in
the LDC.
In the procedures in Chapter 13, it appears that there is potential for review by the
MPB or the CRA but that such review is not required. No incentives are identified in the
procedures. Review requirements are also contained in Chapters 14, 15, and 16.
12. Policy A.3. 8 requires landscaping and buffering for commercial uses adjoining residential
land use. Landscaping requirements are provided in Chapter 16. Buffer requirements are
generally part of the perimeter landscaping requirement. Section 16.46 requires a wall and
shade trees to buffer commercial adjacent to residential areas. These standards may not be
adequate.
13. Policy A.3. 9 requires additional open / green space for all development; requires landscape
islands in the interior of off-street parking. Landscaped islands are required in Chapter 16.
The proposed EAR -based amendment deletes this policy. It is not clear what is meant by
additional. "
14. Policy A.3. 11 requires stronger requirements for retention of existing native vegetation
and trees. Section 14. 90.4 provides that native vegetation should be retained whenever
Retention of existing vegetation is required in Chapter 16. The proposed EAR -based
possible.
amendment deletes this policy. It is not clear what is meant by "stronger."
15. Policy A.3. 12 requires maintenance of vegetation and replacement of dead material.
Maintenance requirements are contained in Chapter 16. The proposed EAR -based amendment
deletes this policy.
16. Policy A.3. 13 requires xeriscaping. Chapter 16 establishes that drought tolerant vegetation is
preferred but not required.
17. Policy A.3. 15 requires sidewalks in the ROW adjacent to any development other than one -
family zoning districts. Chapter 14 requires that proposed sidewalks be shown on the
preliminary plat. Chapter 16 contains sidewalk standards, requiring sidewalks for all
development other than single- family zoning districts.
18. Policy A.3. 16 requires commercial land to provide adequate off-street parking and loading
and includes design guidelines. Parking standards are contained in Chapter 16. The
proposed EAR -based amendment deletes this policy.
19. Policy A.3. 17 requires that dumpsters and rooftop equipment be screened from off -
premises view. Screening of dumpsters is required. However, it is difficult to find this
requirement as it is not clearly labeled. It is a subsection within the landscaping standards in
Chapter 16.
No screening requirements are found pertaining to rooftop equipment. The
proposed EAR -based amendment deletes this policy.
Page 12
Fort Walton Beach Evaluation and Diagnosis Preliminary Review of the LDC
Land Development Code
20. Policy A.4. 1 establishes nonconformity requirements. Chapter 13 contains requirements
pertaining to nonconformities, consistent with this policy.
21. Policy AAA requires City Council approval for creation of three or more lots or parcels;
allows administrative approval of lot splits and lot line adjustments. The LDC is consistent
with this policy, except that, as set forth in Chapter 13, within the CRA, division of land into two
or more lots requires compliance with the subdivision regulations and procedures in Chapter
14. The proposed EAR -based amendment deletes this policy.
22. Policy A.5. 1 establishes Shoreline Protection Zone ( " SPZ "), Wetlands Protection Zone
WPZ "), and Restricted Development Zone ( " RDZ "), with use and location standards.
Chapter 17 contains requirements for establishment of a WPZ, a SPZ, and a RDZ. However, it
appears that the requirements of Chapter 17 are not consistent with the requirements of Policy
A. 5. 1. It also appears that the requirement in Chapter 17 to limit impervious surface to 85% is
significantly less restrictive than requirements pertaining to individual land use categories and
zoning districts. This standard is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
EAR -based amendment revises this policy.
23. Policy A.5. 2 requires control of extraction of natural resources. No regulations have been
identified for control of
