READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 02-27-2007 workshop agenda — reading text
Part 39 of 40. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13400-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
significance of each approach as it relates to market behavior and
defensibility of each approach are considered and weighed.
8. 1 Sales Comparison Approach
The Sales Comparison Approach was used in this analysis as investors and purchasers of
self-use such analysis to make investment decisions. The sales comparison analysis is a good
indicator of market preferences as it demonstrates what active participants are offering in the
present market.
8. 2 Income Approach
The Income Approach was used in this analysis as investors use such analysis in the making
of investment decisions relative to the return on invested capital.
The potential income developed in this analysis is typically year one of a multi- year lease
with cpr adjustments as well as land use restrictions.
It should be noted that in a profit driven market environment it is unlikely that the subject
parcels would be offered for lease or leased by for profit entity as vacant land. The more
35
r,,~~~~-~.
JO}
f__'
YlpP,~,;
pf1,,~[,~ g 1;!,~: ce
Northwest Florida Fair Grounds - Land
8. 3 Value Conclusion
Therefore based on the data and analyses developed in this appraisal, we have reconciled to a
value estimate of:
8. 3. 1 Market Value
The fee simple market value of the subject parcels are:
Parcel # 1 $ 4, 504,000
Parcel # 2 $ 6, 401, 000
Parcel # 3 $ 3, 955, 000
8. 3. 2 Lease ( Annual Income) Value
Parcel # 1 $ 381, 900
Parcel # 2 $ 542, 800
Parcel # 3 $ 335, 400
As of December 20, 2006; subject to the Limiting Conditions and Assumptions of this
appraisal.
8.4 Marketing and Exposure Time
A reasonable marketing time is an estimate of the amount of time it might take to sell an
interest in real property at its estimated market value during the period immediately after the
effective date of the appraisal; the anticipated time required to expose the property to a pool
of prospective purchasers and to allow appropriate time for negotiation, the exercise of due
diligence, and the consummation of a sale at a price supportable by concurrent market
conditions.
The estimated length of time the property interest being appraised would have been offered
on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market
value on the
effective date of the appraisal; a retrospective estimate is based on an analysis of past events
to occur prior to
assuming a competitive and open market Exposure time always presumed
is
the effective date of the appraisal. The overall concept of reasonable expo- sure encompasses
not only adequate, sufficient and reasonable time but also adequate, sufficient and
reasonable
effort time is different for various of real
types estate and value ranges and under
Exposure
various market conditions. ( Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation,
and
Statement on Appraisal Standards No. 6, " Reasonable Exposure time in Real Property
Personal Property Market Value Opinions")
37
I/~----. /~
r=
i.H_.,----b
9lp P
J." '.
r/I. 9~ r!sf. 2.g z;;
rce
Northwest Florida Fair Grounds - Land
Market value estimates imply that an adequate marketing effort and reasonable time for
In the case of disposition value,
exposure occurred prior to the effective date of the appraisal.
the time frame allowed for marketing the property rights is somewhat limited, but the
marketing effort is
orderlyand adequate. With liquidation value, the time frame for
marketing the property rights is so severely limited that an adequate marketing program
cannot be implemented. ( The Report ofthe Appraisal Institute Special Task Force on Value
Definitions qualifies exposure time in tenus of the three above- mentioned values.)
Marketing time differs from exposure time, which is always presumed to precede the
effective date of the appraisal. (Advisory Opinion 7 of the Appraisal Standards Board of The
Appraisal Foundation and Statement on Appraisal Standards No. 6, " Reasonable Exposure
Time in Real Property and Personal Property Market Value Opinions" address the
9
detennination of reasonable exposure and marketing time.)
Marketing and exposure time is estimated to be twelve to eighteen months. Marketing and
exposure time is predicated on the marketing results of
similar properties within the subjects'
market area.
9 The Dictionarv of Real estate Avvraisal- 4th ed. 2002 Appraisal Institute
r-~-- --~ 38
J .- _ f e" _ ..
I r-~
f:
I---~
lp P '~':; . ce
f!;&"
r~ 2g ~;
Northwest Florida Fair Grounds - Land
9 Certification Statement
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported
assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional
analyses, opinions and conclusions.
I have no present or contemplated future interest in the property that is the subject of
this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.
My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value
or
direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate,
the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event.
My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been
prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
USP AP).
I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject ofthis report.
No one provided significant professional assistance to me in the development of the
conclusions contained in this report.
The Appraiser has established sufficient competence to appraise this property through
education and experience, in addition to the internal resources of the appraisal firm.
My value conclusion and other opinions expressed herein are not based on a
requested minimum value, a specific value or approval of a loan.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has
been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional
Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute
and the Institute of Fee Appraisers.
es R. Wilton, Ph. D., IF AS
tate Certified General Real Estate Appraiser 2288
N!!
39
j;~
1:.
t;~
ji~
5tpp ?;':;,,~ Tce
f!s~-~ g 1;;,
Northwest Florida Fair Grounds - Land
10 Bibliography
th
Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 11 Edition. Chicago 1996
Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary ofReal Estate Appraisal, 4th Edition. Chicago 2002
Marshall & Swift, Marshall & Swift Valuation Service, Los Angles 2006
The Appraisal Foundation, Uniform Standards ofProfessional Appraisal Practice,
Washington DC 2006
40
r~ (-'~ -----.;
J w J-------> /.....
irJ .
a- I ~ .. ,-=-- t.
f2tpp l~~,~,'! t~-~( rce
z;,
f!,
Northwest Florida Fair Grounds - Land
11. 1 Site Drawing
NORTHWI!51'PLORlDA FAIRGROUNDS
EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
r'- .-.- .~.-.-.~.- .-,-.- ........- .......- I~ ._,:::-~~.---.~ ,-.-.- '-'-'-Ji ,- ,-.
i:
wi i
i ;, U.L IkJYI!IUaUINT
om'
i i ,.!...- 1.
I
i
if
CXJUNTY
ic':s
l;:'=
UNPL&:
