READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 02-27-2007 workshop agenda — reading text
Part 14 of 40. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13400-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
e., that the
and best use results from the appraiser' s judgment and analytical skill, i~
use determined represents an opinion, not a fact.
The Highest and Best Use section of this report is the pivotal point in the
appraisal process. All previous data is used to test in four criteria, as stated in the
definition: ( 1) legally permitted, ( 2) physically possible, ( 3) economically feasible,
and, ( 4) maximally productive.
The property being appraised includes : i:
l1.99 acres of land area, or
approximately 522, 284 square feet. It. is not zoned, but has a future land use
designated as " county," and is located in an area where the prevalent uses are
commercial along the most highly trafficked roadways and residential off of these
same major roadways.
AS VACANT ANALYSIS - Given the appraisal problem, we' consider the
land as though it were vacant and available to be developed to its highest and best
use. The first criteria of legally permitted allows for a variety of uses. The property
is not currently zoned, but has a future land use of " county." With this being the
case, it is conceivable that any number of uses could be allowed for the land. With
no specifically defined zoning guidelines, all legally permitted possibilities are
considered possible.
The second criteria concerns whether the legal uses are physically possible.
In this we can consider all possible uses. The site is generally level, will be assumed
7
Appraisal Institute, The Dictiona.ry of Real Estate Appraisal, 3rd ed. ( Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 1993) 171.
75
to have adequate access to public roads, and its shape and size are not detriments to
development. Many commercial and industrial uses are physically possible.
Additionally, a residential subdivision use is not beyond possibility for the subject
parcel.We conclude that the physically possible uses of the parcel are many:
The third criteria of economically feasible considers whether the. legally
permissible and physically possible uses are financially feasible at this location and.
under current market conditions. In our opinion, there are limited number of uses
that can be considered financially feasible for the subject parcel. Typical retail and
service commercial development requires ease of access and visibility. The subject
parcel is considered to be too distant from a major roadway to be considered for a
general commercial use depending on exposure to passing traffic. This exposure is
less important, however, for heavy commercial operations similar to those uses
found in the nearby S & P Industrial Park, indicating a possible industrial park use
for the subject parceL A residential use of the subject parcel, especially given the
dwindling supply of vacant home site within the subject neighborhood, could be
considered an economically feasible use of the subject property.
The ,final criteria is that use or those uses that will be maximally productive.
While there is still some land available within the nearby S & P Industrial Park,
this land is limited. New areas of potential residential development are also
severely limited in the Fort Walton Beach area. It is our opinion that while either of
these two uses are feasible, the most productive would be for new residential
construction. Therefore, the highest and best use of the property as if vacant and
available' for improvement to its highest and best use, is considered, to be
residentiaL
AS IMPROVED ANALYSIS - The property being apraised.is currently
improved with a complex of buildings used by the Fair Association. While this use
generates some rental income, the highest and best use of the property is for
residential development.
76
LAND VALUE ANALYSIS - SUBJECT PARCEL #3
The property being appraised contains a total land area of approximately
1:11.99 acres, but without access to a public roadway. An important assumption
of our opinion of market value for the subject Parcel # 3 is that it will have
access to Lewis Turner Boulevard via a 60-foot easement across Parcel # 1.
The land is level a~ d drainage is good. All utilities are available. Residential
development is the highest and best use of the land.
Examination of the descriptions and comparative analysis for the residential
portion of Parcel # 1 reveals that the similarities between it and Parcel #3 are many.
Because of these similarities, the unit value estimate for the residential portion is
considered to be applicable to Parcel # 3. We therefore apply the residential land
value indication of $230, 000 per acre to the :1:11.99 acres of Parcel # 3 as follows:
Estimated Market Value of the Subject' s Land, As Vacant:
1:11.99 Acres times $ 230,000 per AC = $ 2, 757, 700
Rounded to $ 2, 010, 000 2, 760, 000
ESTIMATED LAND VALUE, PARCEL #3
2, 760, 000
77
LAND LEASE ANALYSIS - SUBJECT PARCEL #3
In order to determine a fair market rent for the subject land, we have first
determined an estimate of the market value of the land. In the analysis presented
with Parcel # 1, we determined a reasonable expected rate of return to land similar
to the subject's to be about 8. 5%. We apply this rate of return to the estimated
market value of the subject Parcel # 3 to arrive at a reasonable annual rent for the
land.
An 8. 5% rate of return and estimated value of $2, 760, 000 indicates an annual
market rent of $234,600 for the subject Parcel # 3.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL LEASE, PARCEL #3
234, 600
79
CERTIFICATE OF APPRAISAL
The undersigned does hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this appraisal report:
1) I have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject
of this appraisal report.
2) I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal
report or the parties involved.
3) To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this
appraisal report, upon which the analysis, opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based, are
true and correct.
4) This appraisal report sets forth all of the limiting conditions ( imposed by the term of
my assignment or by the undersigned) affecting the analysis, opinions and
conclusions contained in
this report.
5) This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the
requirements of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
6) The property has been personally inspected by the undersigned. Helping with the
research and analysis was an associate, Stephen McKenney, Florida State Trainee Real
appraisal
Estate Appraiser # RI8246. Full responsibility for the analysis, conclusions and opinions concerning
real estate that are set forth in the appraisal report is that of the undersigned.
7) As of the date of this report, I, M. Eugene Presley, have completed the requirements
under the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute.
8) The subjects of this appraisal report are identified as three defmed parcels that are
parts of parent parcels # 26- 1S- 24- 0000- 0001- 0040 & # 26- 1S- 24- 0000- 0001- 0030, Okaloosa County,
Florida.
9) This appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation nor a
Beach,
specific valuation. The only intended users are representatives of the City of Panama City
Florida, with the onlyintended use the use of the report in the negotiation and acquisition of
being
the part to be acquired by the City.
4
M. Eugene Presley, MAl, BRA
State- Certified General Real Estate Appraiser
OOOO;iO~
I{\
I .~i __./
j'
l'--
i \/ '----.-,
1
j i
st~ hen E. McKenney
State. Registered Trainee Real Estate Appr iser
RI8246
80
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS:
1. This is a Self-Contained Appraisal Report which is intended to comply with
the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2- 2( a) of the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a Self-Contained
Appraisal Report. As such, it includes full discussions of the data, reasoning,
and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the
appraiser' s opinion of value. Supporting documentation concerning the data,
reasoning, and analyses is retained. in the appraiser' s file. The information
contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client and for the
intended use stated in this report. The appraiser is not responsible for
unauthorized use of this report.
2. No responsibility is assumed for legal or title considerations. Title to the
property is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated in
this report.
3. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens and encumbrances
unless otherwise stated in this report.
4. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed
unless otherwise stated in this report.
5. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no
warranty is given for its accuracy.
6. All engineering is assumed to be correct. Any plot plans and illustrative
material in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing
the property.
7. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the
property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No
