READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — December 16, 2014 — 2014-15-legcon-legislative-program-final-1 — reading text
Part 2 of 6. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 103-2014-15-legcon-legislative-program-final-1.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
government to be eligible for consideration.
Public Record and Open Meeting Exemptions for Economic Development:
SUPPORT changes to s.286.0113 and s.288.075, F.S., that would allow the Board of
County Commissioners to deliberate in private regarding an economic development
proposal and preserve the confidentiality of confidential information in the possession of
an economic development agency.
8
2014-15 Legislative Program
Eric Poole, Assistant Legislative Director
Growth Management, Agriculture, Email: epoole@fl-counties.com
Phone: 850-922-4300 Fax: 850-488-7501
& Environment
Stephen James, Legislative Staff Attorney
Email: sjames@fl-counties.com
Phone: 850-922-4300 Fax: 850-488-7501
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
Developments of Regional Impact: SUPPORT legislation that strengthens
intergovernmental coordination processes to ensure that land development projects
resulting in adverse impacts on a neighboring jurisdiction are properly mitigated by the
approving jurisdiction.
Local Regulations / Private Property Rights: SUPPORT an amendment to the
Bert Harris Act (s.70.001, Florida Statutes) to specifically provide that a county’s
adoption of federal Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and implementing regulations do
not give rise to a cause of action under the Bert Harris Act.
Growth Management Reform: The growth reforms of 2011 represented the most
significant changes to the state’s planning laws in more than 25 years. While FAC does
not oppose the revised planning process, it believes that no further revisions should
occur without first evaluating the impact the 2011 changes have had on the economy,
the environment, local and regional infrastructure, and community development.
Accordingly, until such an evaluation takes place, OPPOSE any further reductions in
state planning oversight or other efforts preempting local planning decisions.
Expedited State Review: SUPPORT changes to the Community Planning Act that
would allow small counties to request the “State Coordinated Review Process” be used
for the review of complex plan amendments.
Concurrency: In the absence of state-mandated transportation concurrency, and to
ensure that the roads needed to support new development are concurrent with the
impacts of development, SUPPORT county home rule authority, and current statutory
provisions, which allow counties to retain their current transportation concurrency
systems, as adopted by local ordinance.
Rural Growth: FAC recognizes that rural areas play an important role in our state’s
economy, environment, agriculture, and cultural history. However, from a planning
9
2014-15 Legislative Program
perspective, these areas have received much less attention than their urban and
suburban counterparts. In view of this, SUPPORT the following:
• Restoring the full amount of local technical assistance monies ($3.2 million) to
the Department of Economic Opportunity, as originally provided under SB 360
(2005);
• Targeted technical assistance to small counties for specific comprehensive
planning functions, including Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) issues; and
Proportionate Fair-Share Mitigation: SUPPORT major revisions to the
proportionate share statute to ensure that: (1) the funding formula and its application
are clear and unambiguous; (2) local governments can determine if the payment is
adequate to satisfy the concurrency management system; (3) each development can be
charged its proportionate share of road improvements when the road is deficient or
when development causes the road to become deficient; and, (4) development is not
charged for existing deficiencies or backlog.
REGIONAL PLANNING
Regional Planning Councils (RPCs): SUPPORT full funding of regional planning
councils to, at a minimum, cover the costs of statutory responsibilities, and to support
enhanced economic development activities. OPPOSE legislation prohibiting or
restricting the ability of a regional planning council to provide planning and technical
service to its local governments.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Affordable Housing: SUPPORT retaining the full amount of dedicated documentary
tax revenues to fund state and local affordable housing programs.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
Discretionary Sales Surtaxes (Charter County and Regional Transportation
System Surtax): SUPPORT current law allowing counties, who are eligible to levy the
Charter County and Regional Transportation System Surtax, the discretion to enter into
an inter-local agreement with cities, and expressway authorities for the purpose of
sharing a portion of tax revenues. FAC OPPOSES any legislative efforts that reduce
this authority, including those that would allow cities to levy all or a portion of the
surtax through local referenda.
State Transportation Trust Fund: OPPOSE any effort to divert revenues from the
state transportation trust fund for non-transportation purposes.
10
2014-15 Legislative Program
Regional Transportation Finance Entities: SUPPORT legislation that authorizes
the creation of regional transportation finance authorities, who may be authorized to
use tolls, or pledge a portion of the capacity improvement funds from the State
Transportation Trust Fund to finance eligible transit or transportation improvement
projects.
Rural Transportation Funding: SUPPORT state funding for the Small County Road
Assistance Program (SCRAP). SUPPORT continuing enhanced state funding for the
Small County Outreach Program (SCOP).
Urban Transportation Funding: To help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, promote
energy conservation, and lower the number of vehicle miles traveled, FAC SUPPORTS
a change to the state’s transportation funding investment policy by creating a more
flexible and balanced allocation of funds between transit and traditional highway
capacity improvements.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION
Managed Lanes: SUPPORT changes to FDOT’s “Managed Lanes” designation
process to ensure counties have proper notice and are given an adequate comment
period relating to any state road corridor that is proposed to include managed lanes.
Additionally, revenues derived from managed lane operations that are in excess of the
amounts needed to pay debt service, operations, or maintenance directly related to the
managed lanes in any given year, shall be returned to the county where such revenues
were generated for transit or transportation program expansion, improvement, or
enhancement.
Metropolitan Planning Organizations: OPPOSE FDOT efforts to require urbanized
areas (UZAs) with multiple MPOs to submit one combined project priority list.
Leasing of State Roads: OPPOSE the State of Florida leasing any existing state-
owned toll road to a private concessionaire without creating a more transparent and
inclusive process for FDOT to follow when considering leasing state-owned toll roads.
SUPPORT statutory changes that would:
• Include an early local government notification process;
• Ensure local governments provide comments to the agency prior to it soliciting
proposals relating to the leasing of a toll road;
• Authorize the use of any remaining toll revenues from a lease agreement to be
returned to the affected counties to provide funding for transportation related
11
2014-15 Legislative Program
activities, including but not limited to, reimbursing counties for fire and
emergency rescue services associated with the leased facility; and
• Authorize the use of any upfront revenues (a.k.a., lease payment) and any
excess revenues from a lease agreement to include non-SIS facilities and other
non-capacity projects, including transit, as identified by the Metropolitan
Planning Organization within the county or counties where the lease road is
located.
County Transportation Projects: SUPPORT increasing the cost cap (from $400,00
to $750,000) for counties to self-perform road improvement projects using the
Constitutional Gas Tax proceeds.
Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): SUPPORT legislation allowing SIS funds to
used on roads and other transportation facilities not designated on the SIS network if
the improvement relieves congestion on the SIS.
AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Protections: SUPPORT policies and legislation that curb abuse of
statutory agricultural protections by real estate speculators and developers, while
protecting principles of investment backed expectation.
Rural and Family Lands Protection Act: SUPPORT funding the Rural and Family
Lands Protection Act to allow for the purchase of rural lands protection easements to
prevent the subdivision and conversion of such land into other uses.
Rural Land Stewardship Areas (RLSAs): SUPPORT Rural Land Stewardship Areas
(RLSAs) to maintain the economic value of rural land in Florida, protect the character of
rural areas, ensure the viability of our agricultural economy, and control urban sprawl.
SUPPORT local match funding for technical assistance and planning needed by local
government to implement RLSAs.
Sustainable Agriculture Incentives: SUPPORT legislation that encourages and
incentivizes sustainable agriculture, and the maximization of local food production.
Citrus Greening: SUPPORT state, federal and local efforts to include research and
assist the citrus industry in addressing and controlling the damage and threat caused by
citrus greening/Huanglongbing (HLB).
12
2014-15 Legislative Program
LAND CONSERVATION
Amendment 1–The Florida Water and Land Conservation Amendment:
SUPPORT a balanced distribution of funds for land acquisition and for water quality
and quantity projects throughout the state, with equitable allocation irrespective of a
project’s urban or rural nature, or its coastal or inland location. SUPPORT land
acquisitions of less than fee simple interest, thus reducing the cost to taxpayers while
generating revenue, and allowing property owners to continue certain uses with
negotiable terms. SUPPORT an allocation policy that involves local government
participation in priority assessment and community impact. OPPOSE the use of
Amendment 1 to supplant current funding for beach renourishment, springs protection
and other uses allowed in Amendment 1. SUPPORT the continued funding of the
Water Management Lands Trust Fund and the annual reserve for payments in lieu of
taxes for ad valorem losses incurred as a result of water management district
acquisition or charitable donation. SUPPORT the provision of PILT payments at a level
that reflects current ad valorem revenues with adjustments to reflect any increase in
property value in the future.
BEACHES AND SHORES
Beach Renourishment: SUPPORT the continuation of a statutory funding source for
beach renourishment. SUPPORT a cost-benefit and needs analysis of beach funding
and an increase in state funding levels over the current amount of $30 million, which is
no longer sufficient to sustain the program. SUPPORT a significant increase in
statutory
