Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 11-12-08 special agenda - DRC cure — reading text

Future Land Use Map designation for the property ( MUMS). 2) The proposed structure is in conformance with the height, setback, and lot coverage requirements stipulated by the MUMS zoning regulations conditioned upon approval from FDOT of use of the right of way along Perry Avenue. and the site plan demonstrates that the development will provide the required parking spaces based upon the Memorandum of Agreement. 3) The architectural style and materials for the building are consistent with the intent of the Urban Master Plan Architectural Guidelines and CRA Plan Update. 4) The Community Development Services Department has reviewed the site plan 12.45. 05, Volume IV, Land application under the criteria found in Section Development Code, and finds the foUowing:  a. The proposed site plan is consistent with the Fort Walton Beach Community Redevelopment Plan in that it ensures vacant developable land an~ redeve10pable rehabilitation sites are best utilized to meet the needs and values of the city and specific neighborhoods. b. The proposed site plan is' in conformity with all applicable regulations of the MUMS zoning district, including but not limited to: i. Adequate public facilities and services are available to seNe the proposed development. ii. The setbacks and height of the proposed building meets Land Development Code requirements subject to the approval of a Development Agreement. m. Adequate off-street parking spaces are provided based on the Memorandum of Agreement. iv. Adequate landscape areas and buffers are provided subject to approval of a Development Agreement. v. Provision is made for stormwater management. c. The proposed site plan is consistent with good design standards with respect to all exter~al relationships, including, but not limited to: 1) The relationship to adjoining properties. 2) Internal circulation, both vehicular and pedestrian, and its relationship with the city's street system or proposed waterfront promenade. 3) The design of access and egress, indicating relationship with and impact on adjoining streets. 4) The disposition and use of open space, provision for screening and buffering adjoining properties, landscaping, disposition of storm waters, screening of service areas and preservation of significant natural features, including large trees. 5) The size and bulk of structures in relation to their surroundings. 6) Building arrangement between buildings in the proposed development and between buildings on adjoini~g sites. 7) Shading of adjoining properties by high- rise buildings. 8) Sufficiency of ownership, guarantees for completion of 811 required improvements and, if private, guarantees for continued maintenance. ORDER The CRA site plan application is approved based upon the application submitted and the site plan and architectural drawings developed by DAG Architects Inc. dated 4/ 13/07 and 06/25/ 07 and Engineering Division Memorandums ( dated April 30 and May 15, 2007 from John Geurin), Utilities Memorandums (dated May 24, 2007 from Michael Beedie) and Building Division Memorandum ( dated April 20, 2007 from Linda Development CRA Site Plan Approval Page 20' 4 # 6- 16-SP CRA Case 0 Order.. Carnley) distributed at the May 24, 2007 DRC meeting, which are a1l incorporated by reference and made conditions of this development order along with the following conditions: a. Approval of a Development Agreement addressing the items in the Memorandum of Agreement, FOOT approval to use the right Qfway along Perry, off-site reforestation requirements, and use of city property to meet parking requirement. b. Copies of all necessary permits (Stormwater management) from the FDEP shan be submitted to the Environmental Specialist and City Engineer. c. A copy of the Stormwater management Plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Specialist for review. d. The property owner is advised of the potential for unexpected discoveri~ s. If ground disturbing activities take ptace and unexpected discoveries, such as Native American graves or lot historic cemeteries are encountered. guidelines set forth in chElpter 872, F .S. ( Florida' s Unmarked Burial Law) rnust be followed. In the event unexpected discoveries are made the property owner will notify Florida Sate Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within 24 hours to begin procedures outlined in Chapter 872, F.S" e. The DRC comments found in the attached memorandums from Linda Carnley dated April 20, 2007; John Geurin dated April 30, 2007 and May 15, 2007; and Michael Beedie dated May 24. 2007. ' This ORDER was adopted upon a recording of electronic votes with a vote of _ ayes to nays to APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS THE CRA SITE PLAN APPLICATION TO FT. WALTON DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC ON A PARCEL LOCATED AT 223 Miracle Strip Parkway SE and 208 Perry Avenue SE, Fort Walton Beach, Florida, and Identified as Okaloosa County PercellD # #24- 2S- 24- 0300-000A., Q070, 24- 24-G300- 000A- 006B, 24-2S- 24-G300- o00A- G01 A and 24- 2S- 2S.. 24-0300- o00A.. o01 B. Development Order. CRA Site Plan Appmval Page 30f4 CRA Csse # 06-- 16- SP  Ordered this 10-day of August, 2007, in Fort Walton Beach, Florida. August 10, 2007 Date of Issuance Mike Anderson, Mayor of City Fort Walton Beach, Florida This Order was prepared by: Approved as to form and Jegal sufficiency: Missy McKim, COS Director Toni L. Craig, Florida Bar No. 115444 City of Fort Walton Beach City Attorney, City of Fort Walton Beach PO Box 4009 244 Racetrack Rd NE Fort Walton Beach, FL 32549 . Fort Walton Beach FL 32547 ATTEST: CITY CLERK Development Order - CRA Site Plan Approval Page4of4 CRA Case 0 #6- 16-SP  4i". C\ TY.OF FORT WALTON BEACH INSPECTION REVIEW Date: April 20, 2007 To~ . . DRC Members From: Linda earn ley, CBO~ 833-9599 RE: ' Landmark Center . . Is....... ? w............................. .. W!I!S I.~ -.-.. -. -.- 1)';'A co'm plete' set of :plans shall be reviewed by ICC. One set wit, be sent After firs; t~, r::-., review you Will be required ~o send them two th:eit .it al . . .... In." complete s.ets of stamped/ sealed plans - they will' stamp both and retu.rn ~ o.~h.:where one"~etwOI b~ given to' the contractor al1'd Qne kept iv~~we~ks. '.' . by.tl1~ .\~spectio~ office. Ice review wll( take . ap,r, ox!'. tt~:'I~" n '~he Wl-~d a~ rn.e D~ brls region. All thi~~:~ coisth.ictlon docuni'~nt~ . 1:- ". sh.a,n r~ fl.ect applicable r,equirement~ by the FBC 1..... .:;.. c k. : ". .....? .. .. 3) You win.need to provide Ice all calcul~tlons, geotechnical reports, fi)n~. rgy.forms an.d civlls 4) Prbv1de..five clvils for review by various departments' 5) Provld'e two extra sets qf cQmpleted plans for review by fire Dept and lnsp.~c!jon.. .'. h.ow ~ite ' a<? of FBC c.~ sl~ 1Hty.' n accor~ anc~ wl~h S~ ction ~ 1., 7) " nclude"a completed TItle Page 8) Include Flood Zone 9) ProvIde threshotd ',",spector name and certifications. N'ote on plans that irispection reports shan also be forwarded to th~ Inspection Dept of City a"' . 10) No~e on plans.that as bunt surVeys wIU be required after slab lnspecttons 11) St' p~' ata termite treatments  q' ~~,.. .~. A. street address shall be provided at final inspection t2) permanent 13) AU stgnage shan be permitted separately 14) Show back flow preventor and note on piansthat. AI Jordan of our Water Ops Dept ( at 833-9630) shaH be can~ d for a final Inspection -of the backflQw 15) Include aU req~\ red transitIon strips at egress / ingress points to ~ite 16) Submit an product approvals' :. 1.# 1. r..... . .. . t.... .. f ._:- ' .' _ .._....~..:..  CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 15, 2007 TO: Christy Johnson, CRA Planner FROM: J onn B. Geurin, Engineering Division SUBJECT: THE LANDMARK CENTER MIRACLE STRIP PARKWAY AN'D PERRY AVE. I have reviewed the preliminary site information for the Public Works Department of the above referenced development which was re- submitted for the DRC to be held May 24, 2007. The Engineering Division offers the following comments in order to reach plan 1 approv~ by the PUb,lie Works Department: . 1. An issues identified on my review memo dated April 30," 2007 are still outstanding and will have to be resolved in order to gain approval