Hutchins v. Childress & Baker (1833)
A dispute over a twenty-five-dollar promissory note led the Alabama Supreme Court to examine trial evidence, partnership admissions, and alleged agency. The judgment was reversed and the case remanded.
Southern history / collection
Complete case texts and photographed source pages for Condry v. Henley & Murphey and Ryder v. Innerarity. Unverified audio and superseded reading copies are excluded.
This page organizes sources. Descriptions and connections are research annotations, not a substitute for the underlying evidence.
Up to 50 sources, including nested collections or subjects. Search the full set →
A dispute over a twenty-five-dollar promissory note led the Alabama Supreme Court to examine trial evidence, partnership admissions, and alleged agency. The judgment was reversed and the case remanded.
A Mobile land dispute traced a claim through Issabella Campbell’s Spanish grant, a federal confirmation certificate, and John Forbes & Co. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment for Innerarity.
A constable and his sureties challenged a judgment over an execution he failed to return. The Supreme Court affirmed.